Archive for the ‘Hippies’ Category

Lena Dunham Molests Children; This is What a Child Molester Looks Like

November 4, 2014
Lena Dunham: Child Molester

Lena Dunham: Child Molester

Lena Dunham, the pre-op version of Boss Hogg, is a minor celebrity who has recently admitted she molested her sister.

Previous to copping that she copped massive feels on her own flesh and blood, Dunham was feted by the fags, Jews, feminazis, and other supercilious jackasses on both coasts for allegedly making a little-watched HBO show called Girls. Girls is so little-watched that it doesn’t even average a million viewers per episode. Truth be told, no one is watching Girls except TV critics, who laud the shit out of it due to the excellent P.R. work done by the show’s producers. The very fact that this failure of a show got this fat hog of a child molester on the cover of Vogue is proof that the concentrations of power in this country are very small indeed.

Now before Dunham revealed herself as a child-diddling fucking deviant, my biggest issue with her was the fact that I don’t think she actually makes the show herself.  The biggest boost to Girls‘s buzzworthyiness came because Dunham was only in her mid-20’s when HBO greenlit Girls, with her ostensibly in charge; thus she was hailed as the “voice of a generation” and a wunderkind, thus getting critics to pay attention.

I immediately smelled a rat, especially when I found out that her parents, Laurie Simmons and Carroll Dunham,  are rich, weirdo avant-garde artists. I remember the J.T. Leroy scandal, and how people in showbiz are so desperate for a hit they’ll make up false fronts, names, etc. just to break in.  All-in-all, HBO taking a risk on a 25-year-old with no TV experience made no sense; but taking a risk on her parents doing the show for her and using her as the front man? That made sense. HBO doesn’t really care about the truth anyway, as its left-wing propaganda shows.

But now Dunham has admitted that she molested her kid sister. Bear in mind Dunham is 6 years older than her sister. In her recent memoir, she laughingly recounts three episodes of abuse to her sister:

  • She admits that, when she was 7 and her sister was 1, she pried open her sister’s legs to view her vagina while watching her sister. There is also an implication at this point that Dunham then stuffed rocks into her sister’s vagina and tries to blame it on her 1-year-old sister.
  • She admits that she used to manipulate her sister into lying in bed on top of her while she (Dunham) masturbated.
  • She admits to bribing her sister with candy and other ruses to make out with her—and calls her methods “anything a sexual predator might do.”

All of which Dunham recounts as humorous and exploratory.

Now I will mansplain a few things to you guys. Sexual deviancy laws do apply to children. Children who touch others is sexual ways are punished, placed in foster homes, and put on sex registries. What Dunham did to her sister are enough that, were Dunham not a privileged celebrity cow, she would be registering with the local police for the rest of her life. And no, that’s not a joke; Dunham has literally admitted to crimes.

Lena Dunham is a molester of children.

Now Dunham is facing a backlash because she not only got away with these acts (perhaps—depending on what the statute of limitations were in the states she did them in), but because she thought they weren’t bad acts. In fact, she has tried to deflect criticism by an ironic swat:

That’s right, you guys, it’s soooo weird that you’re freaked out by her actions. Stop being such a prude! Everyone does it!

Remember this the next time someone tries to tell you left-wingers are mentally balanced and/or are morally good. Lena Dunham is their moral and mental leader.

Dunham, being the left-wing ‘tard she is, is desperately trying to stop all dissent. She is threatening to sue people who merely repeat her own admissions to child molestation.

Well fuck you, Lena Dunham.

You’re an unrepentant child molester.

You are an evil fucking ugly cow.

And you don’t even run Girls, a show no one watches.

Just a reminder: The Bible says you should judge

October 20, 2014

Lefties invented and perfected the Big Lie. The National Socialists used it to great effect, but other leftists (Soviets, Cubans, Venezuelans, North Koreans, Libyans, etc.) also abused it to death.

One part of the Big Lie is repetition: people will truly believe anything if its said by enough people. Peer pressure wasn’t just something your D.A.R.E. officer told you about to scare you; it is very, very real.

One Big Lie the left likes to tell is that Jesus commands people not to “judge” others, and by judge they mean “say that someone is doing something bad, or that a person is evil.” In fact they often quote Jesus’s words (twistedly, of course): “Judge lest ye be judged.”

Of course they’re lying.

Jesus never says don’t judge someone as sinning or being evil. The context of his quote is that Jesus is saying “don’t be a hypocrite when you judge people.” This is the whole “remove the mote from your own eye” argument-context. In fact, Jesus was condemning the Jewish high priests for their hypocrisy, as they would condemn people for sins they themselves or their family were committing and getting off scot-free.

Jesus had no problem for you condemning another’s sins if you were free of such sin yourself. In fact, in both the Gospel of Luke and in the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus orders his followers to do just that.

What Jesus hated in sinners was hypocrisy, which the Jewish high council had in droves. Compare Jesus’s treatment of prostitutes, thieves, and tax collectors.  He dines with them because they know they are sinners and want t do better. Jesus curses those who sin and don’t care, or worse complain abut others doing their same sins. Compare, again, Jesus’s treatment of the two thieves he is crucified with—one has no repentance, and demands Jesus save them; Jesus ignores him, likely knowing that, that day, he would see him in hell. The other begs Jesus’s forgiveness for his crimes; Jesus pardons him and promises him heaven.

For example, if you don’t molest children, condemn homosexuals.

Fuck the left. Yay Jesus. Condemn sinners.

Men of the West, Listen to Aurini’s Gold

March 13, 2013

Men of the West, listen to Aurini’s gold.

Sharia law is looking very good, ladies. Beat you into submission and silence, castrate the niggers, stone the fags, re-promote male leadership and greatness.

Leftist chickens…are coming home…to roost.

lol. Another Nigger-Fucker Gets What She Deserves

March 5, 2013

lol. Another nigger-fucker gets what she deserves.

A painful death and a short life at the hands of her ape-lover.

Remember ladies: when you’re screaming for help as you’re being raped and murdered by the “diverse” guy you went out with, the “racist-sexist-homophobic patriarchal assholes” that you shit on daily, that used to unflinchingly protect you from these uncivilized monkeys…will now only laugh and cheer them on.

Enjoy the decline, bitches!

Leftism as a Cult?: A Tenative Hypothesis

January 20, 2013

I’ve had a rather murky epiphany as of late. If it holds true, it could provide to myself and other anti-leftists a wealth of power and knowledge in combating the evil that is leftism. And it comes, strangely, from fire-bomber Ann Coulter.

I do not know quite how to take Coulter—is she a career-driven loudmouth who only takes extreme right wing opinions because she thinks it will give her more fame? Is she genuinely adhering to most or all of her extreme beliefs? Or is she merely a right-winger who deliberately pushes more extreme right wing views to “give space” to more moderate righties? I do not know. But in thinking about her thesis in Godless: the Church of Liberalism, I have realized that she was on to something.

Certainly she was not the first, nor the most articulate in pointing out that left-wing ideology is like a religion to adherents. However, to the generation of people who became politically aware in the 1990s and 2000s, she is the loudest voice asserting this.

So I’ve explored this issue, and concluded that the idea the leftism is a religion is both right and wrong. It is right to say it is a substitute spiritualism for leftists. However, it is wrong to say that leftism is a religion.

Instead, leftism is, I tentatively believe, a cult.

Any assistance from readers in helping me flesh this out in the coming weeks would be greatly appreciated. I plan on a series of posts explaining my belief that left wing thought is a cult.

“The 60’s” and Communist Propaganda

December 5, 2012

In response to Steve Sailer’s posts here and here (though, as always, I hate Taki).

I’m usually one who mocks conspiracy theorists, so I fully expect some kind of take down here but…

I think “the 60’s” can be explained by communist propaganda.

Look, pre-1960s, America had twice gone on a major rampage against Communist spying: the 1920s (where, just before that, the “Progressives” gave us women voting and Prohibition) and the 1950s. And, if you read up on the history of these times—not just the propaganda disseminated by left-wing sympathizers—you find that, behind the demagoguery of McCarthy (who was a classic “pick a target, freeze it, polarize it” idol for pre-Alinksyites) were very scary, very Anti-American actions by left-wing sympathizers within the U.S. Terrorism and spying for Mother Russia being two major items. These were not “scares” or panics—they were based on very real infiltration of the U.S. by Communist agitators.

But, by the late 1950s, the KGB/CPUSA were honing a successful counter-offensive to any prosecution of organized left-wing agitation:

1. Use of entertainment industry to downplay Communist actions and attack anti-communists as opportunists/fanatics (e.g. The Crucible)

2. Finding extreme anti-communists and holding them up as examples of the entire anti-communist movement (McCarthy)—often by feeding news organizations info on them to discredit them.

3. Likewise, finding sympathetic left-wing “innocents” who were “victims” of anti-communists/right wingers (e.g. the “blacklisted” writers, The Ethel Rosenberg Cult, Medgar Evans, MLK). I call this “creating martyrs” or “Al Queda” syndrome.

4. Also feeding News organizations spectacles tailor-made to seem large on the (brand new) medium of television, but were in reality quite small and led by few people (e.g. “peaceful” black civil rights demonstrations being hosed down , feminism, Vietnam “massacres”). Especially at times there were stories breaking of violence by left-wing agitators—better to distract

5. While not creating conspiracy theories, encouraging any blossoming ones that fostered distrust in the U.S. government or right-wing morale (e.g. the KGB actively promoted JFK conspiracy theorists, especially those that implicated the CIA or anti-communist ones).

6. Discrediting right-wing centric organizations (e.g. lying about the Klan, purging the Birchers).

In this context, we encounter 60’s “social” movements. The hippie movement, the feminist movement, and the civil rights movement all were agitated, financed, and organized by communist/KGB front groups (e.g. almost all of MLK’s white advisers—especially those dealing with the media—were involved with communism). Most people those days didn’t march or protest or go to Woodstock, but communists made sure the TV screens were filled with them weekly, and made sure entertainers wrote pop songs extolling them and movies celebrating them.

Once you had people on board with the idea that “everyone” was doing it, people naturally followed suit. Most people are followers, and if this is how “everyone” was thinking, it must be right.

The successful pushback using McCarthy as the symbol of the anti-communist movement emboldened the left, and Hoover’s waning power at the end of his life, and in regards to his conflict with Kennedy and Johnson, meant that the opposition was severely curtailed.

When Nixon, fierce anti-commie, realized that TV reality was not actual reality, he began his “Silent Majority” movement, which culminated in his surprise victories (and showed that lefty-media types totally bought commie propaganda, as displayed by Pauline Kael’s famous statement on not knowing who voted for Nixon).

But by then, the value of more than a decade of successful demoralization was done: Vietnam, though winnable, was lost as a cause to the American people, and Nixon pulled out; Nixon got rid of the gold standard, rationing, and implemented Affirmative Action and the EPA and all sorts of nonsense, and basically threw a lot of bones to the left to keep them from getting too upset (until, of course, the commies/KGB made a HUGE deal out of Watergate, a minor scandal, just to rid themselves of an anti-communist).

I think the 1970s the commies ideas waned, as televised protests became old hat and boring. Probably US counter-intelligence made a comeback or the KGB lost some key players, or maybe commie focus shifted to other nations. In any event, Reagan’s election was a bad thing for them, because he was both fiercely anti-communist AND, just as importantly, knew how to stage public events for the cameras.

Anyway, the more I study the history of communist spying (thanks James Bond!) and the power of news-entertainment propaganda, the more this hypothesis moves me: the “60’s” was nothing more than a massive and very successful propaganda campaign by KGB/CPUSA forces to demoralize and discredit U.S. anti-communists.

Ann Althouse: Murdering a Newborn Child is Ok, We Should Have Sympathy for the Murderer

October 3, 2012

Easy Annie A. does it again.

First, it was 1984-ing any comments that brought up factual black dysfunction while at the same time posting that showing videos of black people taken with their permission is evil racism.

Now, it’s claiming that a girl who murdered her newborn son after hiding her pregnancy is somehow a sympathetic hero.

This is leftism, America; where truth goes to die, and murdering children is an act of heroism.

Chuck Rudd must feel right at home there.

Lefties always bring down society by calling them rights

May 10, 2012

Lefties always bring down society by calling things rights.

First, they declare that murdering one’s child is a “right” mythically held by women.

Then, they declare that two mentally-diseased people of the same sex can get “married,” or you’re just denying them “equal rights” as normal, non-mentally diseased couples.

Anytime a leftist starts talking about rights, what they really mean is to destroy humanity.

Occutards Threaten Violence Against All Those Who Oppose Them

February 8, 2012

Occutards threaten violence against all those who oppose them.

Remember when they spit on servicemen?

Obama’s brownshirts. Fucking going to start a Reichstag Fire to keep their commie-asshole-in-chief from facing an election. Hope to cancel it By Any Means Necessary.

If the lefties get away with this….well, the Republic was lost long ago.

No doubt the right will cower under and fail to blame the left (and their leader, Obama) for this. And thus we fall further into tyranny. Womanish cowards, all of them.

This is What Happens When You Put Niggers in Charge of Shit.

February 2, 2012

This is what happens when you put niggers in charge of shit.

The corrupt nigger appointed by another corrupt nigger is the most corrupt Attorney General in U.S. History.

Let’s not forget Fast & Furious (still ongoing).

Or how these niggers let other violent niggers go precisely because they were niggers.

Holder should be arrested by the U.S. government, tried, convicted, and punished by being thrown into a dungeon and water-boarded every day for the rest of his life. And Obama? The same.

Fuck you liberals. And fuck Obama.